Token computeInterstice Advisory
ScenarioHelsinki Waste-Heat Campus 80 MW — Finland (Fingrid)case finland_helsinki_80mw · engine devConsoleThe machine
Why capital binds

The binding constraint is capital. Its gap metric is 85 % ◌ derived; the runner-up is timeline at 50 % ◌ derived, a margin of 35 % ◌ derived.

Regime R2 ◌ derived: a mild supply-demand imbalance; utilisation pressure is building while the facility remains cash-generative.

Capital binds at 85 % ◌ derived. Levered NPV is -$88.9 M ◌ derived at a WACC of 10.4 % ◌ derived. The physical envelope clears; the financing does not.

Sweat the current fleetRefresh each cycleRefresh blocked
Counterfactual, sweat versus refresh: at 80 kW ◌ derived design density no next chip generation is supportable — the nearest higher generation enters at 120 kW ◌ derived per rack. The refresh path holds the current generation and matches the sweat path over the analysis horizon; the facility supports 1 ◌ derived generation classes over 5 years ◌ derived.

Whether that is acceptable is a judgment this model does not make.